| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 17 | |
| 1. |  | MASUDA, Y.; AGUILAR, I.; TSURUTA, S.; MISZTAL, I. Acceleration of computations in AI REML for single-step GBLUP models. Volume Methods and Tools: Statistical methods - linear and nonlinear models (Posters), 703. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, 10., Vancouver, BC, Canada, August 17-22, 2014. p.703.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|    |
| 2. | | MASUDA, Y.; AGUILAR, I.; TSURUTA, S.; MISZTAL, I. Technical note: Acceleration of sparse operations for average-information REML analyses with supernodal methods and sparse-storage refinements. Journal of Animal Science, 2015, v. 93, p. 4670 - 4674. Published October 9, 2015 Article history: Received June 8, 2015.; Accepted August 7, 2015.
1. We acknowledge the work by François Guillaume in programming a hash function. We greatly appreciate the work of the two anonymous reviewers.
2. The AIREMLF90 program...| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|  |
| 3. | | MACEDO, F.; CHRISTENSEN, O. F.; ASTRUC, J.M.; AGUILAR, I.; MASUDA, Y.; LEGARRA, A. Bias and accuracy of dairy sheep evaluations using BLUP and SSGBLUP with metafounders and unknown parent groups. Genetics, Selection, Evolution : GSE, 12 August 2020, Volume 52, Issue 1, Page 47. OPEN ACCESS. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-020-00567-1 Article history: Received 03 March 2020; Accepted 04 August 2020; Published 12 August 2020.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|  |
| 4. | | AGUILAR, I.; TSURUTA, S.; MASUDA, Y.; LOURENCO, D.A.L.; LEGARRA, A.; MISZTAL, I. BLUPF90 suite of programs for animal breeding with focus on genomics. Volume Methods and Tools - Software, p. 751. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, 11., Aotea Centre Auckland, New Zealand: WCGALP, ICAR, 11-16 feb 2018. 6 p.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 5. | | LOURENÇO, D. A. L.; MISZTAL, I.; TSURUTA, S.; FRAGOMENI, B.; AGUILAR, I.; MASUDA, Y.; MOSER, D. Direct and indirect genomic evaluations in beef cattle. Interbull Bulletin, 2015, v. 49, p.80 - 84.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 6. | | AGUILAR, I.; LEGARRA, A.; CARDOSO, F.; MASUDA, Y.; LOURENCO, D.; MISZTAL, I. Frequentist p-values for large-scale-single step genome-wide association, with an application to birth weight in American Angus cattle. (Short Communication) Genetics Selection Evolution, 20 June 2019, v. 51, Issue 1, Article number 28. OPEN ACCESS. Article history: Received: 3 January 2019 // Accepted: 27 May 2019 // Published Online: 20 June 2019.
Funding text: This study was partially funded by the American Angus Association (St. Joseph, MO) and by Agriculture and Food Research...| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 7. | | MISZTAL, I.; LOURENCO, D.; TSURUTA, S.; AGUILAR, I.; MASUDA, Y.; BERMANN, M.; CESARANI, A.; LEGARRA, A. How ssGBLUP became suitable for national dairy cattle evaluations. [668]. Part 37 - Bovine dairy - genetic evaluation methods. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production (WCGALP), 12., Rotterdam, the Netherlands, 3-8 July 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-940-4_668 2757-2760. Article history: Published online: February 9, 2023 -- Corresponding author: I. Misztal, email: ignacy@uga.edu| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 8. | | LOURENCO, D.; TSURUTA, S.; AGUILAR, I.; MASUDA, Y.; BERMANN, M.; LEGARRA, A.; MISZTAL, I. Recent updates in the BLUPF90 software suite. [366]. Part 19 - Methods and tools: software and computing strategies. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production (WCGALP), 12., Rotterdam, the Netherlands, 3-8 July 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-940-4_366 1530-1533. Article history: Published online: February 9, 2023. -- Corresponding author: D. Lourenco, email: danilino@uga.edu| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 9. | | LOURENCO, D.; LEGARRA, A.; TSURUTA, S.; MASUDA, Y.; AGUILAR, I.; MISZTAL, I. Single-step genomic evaluations from theory to practice: using snp chips and sequence data in blupf90. Genes, July 2020. Volume 11, Issue 7, Article number 790, Pages 1-32. Open Access. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11070790 Article history: Received: 19 June 2020 / Revised: 3 July 2020 / Accepted: 6 July 2020 / Published: 14 July 2020.
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genomic Prediction Methods for Sequencing Data):...| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 10. | | FRAGOMENI, B.O.; LOURENCO, D.A.L.; TSURUTA, S.; MASUDA, Y.; AGUILAR, I.; MISZTAL, I. Use of genomic recursions and algorithm for proven and young animals for single-step genomic BLUP analyses - a simulation study. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 2015, v.132, no.5, p. 340-345.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 11. | | MISZTAL, I.; FRAGOMENI, B.; LOURENÇO, D. A. L.; TSURUTA, S.; MASUDA, Y.; AGUILAR, I.; LEGARRA, A.; LAWLOR, T. J. Efficient inversion of genomic relationship matrix by the Algorithm for Proven and Young (APY). Interbull Bulletin, 2015, v. 49, p. 111-116.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 12. | | FRAGOMENI, B.O.; LOURENCO, D.A.L.; TSURUTA, S.; MASUDA, Y.; AGUILAR, I.; LEGARRA, A.; LAWLOR, T.J.; MIZTAL, I. Hot topic: Use of genomic recursions in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) with a large number of genotypes. Journal of Dairy Science, 2015, v.98, no.6, p.4090-4094. OPEN ACCESS. Article history: Received November 18, 2014 / Accepted March 13, 2015 / Published online: April 8, 2015.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 13. | | MASUDA, Y.; MISZTAL, I.; TSURUTA, S.; LEGARRA, A.; AGUILAR, I.; LOURENCO, D.A.L.; FRAGOMENI, B.O.; LAWLOR, T.J. Implementation of genomic recursions in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor for US Holsteins with a large number of genotyped animals. Journal of Dairy Science, 2016, v.99, no.3, p.1968-1974. OPEN ACCESS OPEN ACCESS. Received 19 October 2015, Accepted 1 December 2015, Available online 21 January 2016| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 14. | | LOURENCO, D.; TSURUTA, S.; FRAGOMENI, B.; MASUDA, Y.; AGUILAR, I.; LEGARRA, A.; MILLER, S.; MOSER, D.; MISZTAL, I. Single-step genomic BLUP for national beef cattle evaluation in US: from initial developments to final implementation. Volume Species - Bovine (beef) 1, 495. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, 11., Aotea Centre Auckland, New Zealand: WCGALP, ICAR, 11-16 feb 2018.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 15. | | MASUDA, Y.; MISZTAL, I.; TSURUTA, S.; LOURENÇO, D. A. L.; FRAGOMENI, B.; LEGARRA, A.; AGUILAR, I.; LAWLOR, T. J. Single-step genomic evaluations with 570K genotyped animals in US Holsteins. Interbull Bulletin, 2015, v. 49, p. 85-89.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 16. | | MASUDA, Y; MISZTAL, I.; LEGARRA, A.; TSURUTA, S.; LOURENCO, D.A.L.; FRAGOMENI, B.O.; AGUILAR, I. Technical note: Avoiding the direct inversion of the numerator relationship matrix for genotyped animals in single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction solved with the preconditioned conjugate gradient. Journal of Animal Science, 2017, v. 95(1): 49-52. Article history: Received: July 05, 2016; Accepted: Aug 16, 2016; Published: February 2, 2017.
This research was partially funded by the United States Department of Agriculture?s National Institute of Food and Agriculture (Agriculture and...| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 17. | | LOURENCO, D. A. L.; TSURUTA, S.; FRAGOMENI, B. O.; MASUDA, Y.; AGUILAR, I.; LEGARRA, A.; BERTRAND, J. K.; AMEN, T. S.; WANG. L.; MOSER, D. W.; MISZTAL, I. Genetic evaluation using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in American Angus.(*) Journal of Animal Science, 2015, v. 93, p. 2653-2662. Published June 25, 2015. OPEN ACCESS. (*) This study was partially funded by the American Angus Association (St. Joseph, MO), Zoetis (Kalamazoo, MI), and Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grants no. 2015-67015-22936 from the U.S. Department of Agriculture?s...| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 17 | |
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha actual : |
26/11/2015 |
|
Actualizado : |
29/01/2020 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
LOURENCO, D. A. L.; TSURUTA, S.; FRAGOMENI, B. O.; MASUDA, Y.; AGUILAR, I.; LEGARRA, A.; BERTRAND, J. K.; AMEN, T. S.; WANG. L.; MOSER, D. W.; MISZTAL, I. |
|
Afiliación : |
D. A. L. LOURENCO, Universidad de Georgia (UG); SHOGO TSURUTA, Universidad de Georgia (UG); B. O. FRAGOMENI, Universidad de Georgia (UG); Y. MASUDA, Universidad de Georgia (UG); IGNACIO AGUILAR GARCIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; A. LEGARRA, INRA (Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique); J. K. BERTRAND, Universidad de Georgia (UG); T. S. AMEN, Angus Genetics Inc.; L. WANG, Angus Genetics Inc.; D. W. MOSER, Angus Genetics Inc.; IGNACY MISZTAL, Universidad de Georgia (UG). |
|
Título : |
Genetic evaluation using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in American Angus.(*) |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2015 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Journal of Animal Science, 2015, v. 93, p. 2653-2662. Published June 25, 2015. OPEN ACCESS. |
|
DOI : |
10.2527/jas.2014-8836 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
(*) This study was partially funded by the American Angus Association (St. Joseph, MO), Zoetis (Kalamazoo, MI), and Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grants no. 2015-67015-22936 from the U.S. Department of Agriculture?s National Institute of Food and Agriculture. We gratefully acknowledge the very helpful comments by the two anonymous reviewers. |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
Predictive ability of genomic EBV when using single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) in Angus cattle was investigated. Over 6 million records were available on birth weight (BiW) and weaning weight (WW), almost 3.4 million on postweaning gain (PWG), and over 1.3 million on calving ease (CE). Genomic information was available on, at most, 51,883 animals,
which included high and low EBV accuracy animals. Traditional EBV was computed by BLUP and genomic EBV by ssGBLUP and indirect prediction based on SNP effects was derived from ssGBLUP; SNP effects were calculated based on the following reference populations: ref_2k (contains top bulls and top cows that had an EBV accuracy for BiW ≥0.85), ref_8k (contains all parents that were genotyped), and ref_33k (contains all genotyped animals born up to 2012). Indirect prediction was obtained as direct genomic value (DGV) or as an
index of DGV and parent average (PA). Additionally, runs with ssGBLUP used the inverse of the genomic relationship matrix calculated by an algorithm for proven and young animals (APY) that uses recursions on a small subset of reference animals. An extra reference subset included 3,872 genotyped parents of genotyped animals (ref_4k). Cross-validation was used to assess predictive ability on a validation population of 18,721 animals born in 2013. Computations for growth traits used multiple-trait linear model and, for CE, a bivariate CE?BiW threshold-linear model. With BLUP, predictivities were 0.29, 0.34, 0.23, and 0.12 for BiW, WW, PWG, and CE, respectively. With ssGBLUP and ref_2k, predictivities were 0.34, 0.35, 0.27, and 0.13 for BiW, WW, PWG, and CE, respectively, and with ssGBLUP and ref_33k, predictivities were 0.39, 0.38, 0.29, and 0.13 for BiW, WW, PWG, and CE, respectively. Low predictivity for CE was due to low incidence rate of difficult calving. Indirect predictions with ref_33k were as accurate as with full ssGBLUP. Using the APY and recursions on ref_4k gave 88% gains of full ssGBLUP and using the APY and recursions on ref_8k gave 97% gains of full ssGBLUP. Genomic evaluation in beef cattle with ssGBLUP is feasible while keeping the models (maternal, multiple trait, and threshold) already used in regular BLUP. Gains in predictivity are dependent on the composition of the reference population. Indirect predictions via SNP effects derived from ssGBLUP allow for accurate genomic predictions on young animals, with no advantage of including PA in
the index if the reference population is large. With the APY conditioning on about 10,000 reference animals, ssGBLUP is potentially applicable to a large number of genotyped animals without compromising predictive ability.
© 2015 American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved MenosABSTRACT.
Predictive ability of genomic EBV when using single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) in Angus cattle was investigated. Over 6 million records were available on birth weight (BiW) and weaning weight (WW), almost 3.4 million on postweaning gain (PWG), and over 1.3 million on calving ease (CE). Genomic information was available on, at most, 51,883 animals,
which included high and low EBV accuracy animals. Traditional EBV was computed by BLUP and genomic EBV by ssGBLUP and indirect prediction based on SNP effects was derived from ssGBLUP; SNP effects were calculated based on the following reference populations: ref_2k (contains top bulls and top cows that had an EBV accuracy for BiW ≥0.85), ref_8k (contains all parents that were genotyped), and ref_33k (contains all genotyped animals born up to 2012). Indirect prediction was obtained as direct genomic value (DGV) or as an
index of DGV and parent average (PA). Additionally, runs with ssGBLUP used the inverse of the genomic relationship matrix calculated by an algorithm for proven and young animals (APY) that uses recursions on a small subset of reference animals. An extra reference subset included 3,872 genotyped parents of genotyped animals (ref_4k). Cross-validation was used to assess predictive ability on a validation population of 18,721 animals born in 2013. Computations for growth traits used multiple-trait linear model and, for CE, a bivariate CE?BiW threshold-linear model. With BLUP, predictivities were 0.29,... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
BEEF CATTLE; GENETIC RESURSION; INDIRECT PREDICTION. |
|
Thesagro : |
GANADO DE CARNE; GENOMIC SELECTION; MEJORAMIENTO GENETICO ANIMAL. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L10 Genética y mejoramiento animal |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/5303/1/Lourenco-et-al-2015-JAS.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 04125naa a2200337 a 4500
001 1054005
005 2020-01-29
008 2015 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.2527/jas.2014-8836$2DOI
100 1 $aLOURENCO, D. A. L.
245 $aGenetic evaluation using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in American Angus.(*)$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2015
500 $a(*) This study was partially funded by the American Angus Association (St. Joseph, MO), Zoetis (Kalamazoo, MI), and Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grants no. 2015-67015-22936 from the U.S. Department of Agriculture?s National Institute of Food and Agriculture. We gratefully acknowledge the very helpful comments by the two anonymous reviewers.
520 $aABSTRACT. Predictive ability of genomic EBV when using single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) in Angus cattle was investigated. Over 6 million records were available on birth weight (BiW) and weaning weight (WW), almost 3.4 million on postweaning gain (PWG), and over 1.3 million on calving ease (CE). Genomic information was available on, at most, 51,883 animals, which included high and low EBV accuracy animals. Traditional EBV was computed by BLUP and genomic EBV by ssGBLUP and indirect prediction based on SNP effects was derived from ssGBLUP; SNP effects were calculated based on the following reference populations: ref_2k (contains top bulls and top cows that had an EBV accuracy for BiW ≥0.85), ref_8k (contains all parents that were genotyped), and ref_33k (contains all genotyped animals born up to 2012). Indirect prediction was obtained as direct genomic value (DGV) or as an index of DGV and parent average (PA). Additionally, runs with ssGBLUP used the inverse of the genomic relationship matrix calculated by an algorithm for proven and young animals (APY) that uses recursions on a small subset of reference animals. An extra reference subset included 3,872 genotyped parents of genotyped animals (ref_4k). Cross-validation was used to assess predictive ability on a validation population of 18,721 animals born in 2013. Computations for growth traits used multiple-trait linear model and, for CE, a bivariate CE?BiW threshold-linear model. With BLUP, predictivities were 0.29, 0.34, 0.23, and 0.12 for BiW, WW, PWG, and CE, respectively. With ssGBLUP and ref_2k, predictivities were 0.34, 0.35, 0.27, and 0.13 for BiW, WW, PWG, and CE, respectively, and with ssGBLUP and ref_33k, predictivities were 0.39, 0.38, 0.29, and 0.13 for BiW, WW, PWG, and CE, respectively. Low predictivity for CE was due to low incidence rate of difficult calving. Indirect predictions with ref_33k were as accurate as with full ssGBLUP. Using the APY and recursions on ref_4k gave 88% gains of full ssGBLUP and using the APY and recursions on ref_8k gave 97% gains of full ssGBLUP. Genomic evaluation in beef cattle with ssGBLUP is feasible while keeping the models (maternal, multiple trait, and threshold) already used in regular BLUP. Gains in predictivity are dependent on the composition of the reference population. Indirect predictions via SNP effects derived from ssGBLUP allow for accurate genomic predictions on young animals, with no advantage of including PA in the index if the reference population is large. With the APY conditioning on about 10,000 reference animals, ssGBLUP is potentially applicable to a large number of genotyped animals without compromising predictive ability. © 2015 American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved
650 $aGANADO DE CARNE
650 $aGENOMIC SELECTION
650 $aMEJORAMIENTO GENETICO ANIMAL
653 $aBEEF CATTLE
653 $aGENETIC RESURSION
653 $aINDIRECT PREDICTION
700 1 $aTSURUTA, S.
700 1 $aFRAGOMENI, B. O.
700 1 $aMASUDA, Y.
700 1 $aAGUILAR, I.
700 1 $aLEGARRA, A.
700 1 $aBERTRAND, J. K.
700 1 $aAMEN, T. S.
700 1 $aWANG. L.
700 1 $aMOSER, D. W.
700 1 $aMISZTAL, I.
773 $tJournal of Animal Science, 2015$gv. 93, p. 2653-2662. Published June 25, 2015. OPEN ACCESS.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
